Solove, Daniel J., 1972-
Nothing to hide the false tradeoff between privacy and security / [electronic resource] : Daniel J. Solove. - New Haven [Conn.] : Yale University Press, c2011. - ix, 245 p. : ill.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
The nothing-to-hide argument -- The all-or-nothing fallacy -- The danger of deference -- Why privacy isn't merely an individual right -- The pendulum argument -- The national-security argument -- The problem with dissolving the crime-espionage distinction -- The war-powers argument and the rule of law -- The Fourth Amendment and the secrecy paradigm -- The third party doctrine and digital dossiers -- The failure of looking for a reasonable expectation of privacy -- The suspicionless-searches argument -- Should we keep the exclusionary rule? -- The first amendment as criminal procedure -- Will repealing the Patriot Act restore our privacy? -- The law-and-technology problem and the leave-it-to-the-legislature argument -- Video surveillance and the no-privacy-in-public argument -- Should the government engage in data mining? -- The Luddite argument, the Titanic phenomenon, and the fix-a-problem strategy.
Electronic reproduction.
Palo Alto, Calif. :
ebrary,
2013.
Available via World Wide Web.
Access may be limited to ebrary affiliated libraries.
Privacy, Right of--United States.
Law enforcement--United States.
National security--Law and legislation--United States.
Electronic books.
KF1262 / .S663 2011eb
342.7308/58
Nothing to hide the false tradeoff between privacy and security / [electronic resource] : Daniel J. Solove. - New Haven [Conn.] : Yale University Press, c2011. - ix, 245 p. : ill.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
The nothing-to-hide argument -- The all-or-nothing fallacy -- The danger of deference -- Why privacy isn't merely an individual right -- The pendulum argument -- The national-security argument -- The problem with dissolving the crime-espionage distinction -- The war-powers argument and the rule of law -- The Fourth Amendment and the secrecy paradigm -- The third party doctrine and digital dossiers -- The failure of looking for a reasonable expectation of privacy -- The suspicionless-searches argument -- Should we keep the exclusionary rule? -- The first amendment as criminal procedure -- Will repealing the Patriot Act restore our privacy? -- The law-and-technology problem and the leave-it-to-the-legislature argument -- Video surveillance and the no-privacy-in-public argument -- Should the government engage in data mining? -- The Luddite argument, the Titanic phenomenon, and the fix-a-problem strategy.
Electronic reproduction.
Palo Alto, Calif. :
ebrary,
2013.
Available via World Wide Web.
Access may be limited to ebrary affiliated libraries.
Privacy, Right of--United States.
Law enforcement--United States.
National security--Law and legislation--United States.
Electronic books.
KF1262 / .S663 2011eb
342.7308/58